The cr.yp.to microblog: 2014.01.03 16:44:53

2014.01.03 16:44:53 (419132262148354048) from Daniel J. Bernstein, replying to "Jacob Appelbaum (@ioerror)" (418457643020079104):

"No suspicion" is non-binding dicta. The actual ruling is that 1st/4th-amt issues must be raised _after_ a laptop search. "Bivens." @ioerror

Context

2014.01.01 20:04:11 (418457643020079104) from "Jacob Appelbaum (@ioerror)":

Weep for America. "Court Rules No Suspicion Needed for Laptop Searches at Border" https://www.aclu.org/national-security-technology-and-liberty/court-rules-no-suspicion-needed-laptop-searches-border #aclu