2016.01.01 19:10:45 (682987338855804928) from Daniel J. Bernstein, replying to "Whitney Merrill (@wbm312)" (682983286315085825):
@wbm312 Even before recent cases (House, Cotterman, Kim, and the obvious impact of Riley) "4th doesn't apply at border" was an exaggeration.
2016.01.01 18:39:16 (682979417363230721) from Daniel J. Bernstein:
Enjoyed reading https://www.eff.org/files/2015/09/10/saboonchi_eff_amicus_brief.pdf but why has @EFF not corrected https://www.eff.org/files/filenode/eff-border-search_0.pdf? Heard same mistake in @wbm312 talk at #32c3.
2016.01.01 18:52:37 (682982774173790208) from "Whitney Merrill (@wbm312)":
@hashbreaker I did not make a mistake-decided not to go into intricacies of border law. Happy to share slides from talk on border searches
2016.01.01 18:54:39 (682983286315085825) from "Whitney Merrill (@wbm312)", replying to "Whitney Merrill (@wbm312)" (682982774173790208):
@hashbreaker current case law is narrow and Supreme Court has not ruled on many issues.