The cr.yp.to microblog: 2016.05.26 17:16:35

2016.05.26 17:16:35 (735852137494765569) from Daniel J. Bernstein, replying to "Ben Adida (@benadida)" (735846552753688579):

This wasn't my paper; it's just one of many inexcusable eprint censorship incidents that I've heard about.

Context

2016.05.26 16:54:24 (735846552753688579) from "Ben Adida (@benadida)":

cool, though it sounds like @hashbreaker paper got extra review not described in policy. Worth clarifying why?