2016.07.27 12:24:41 (758246724473348096) from Daniel J. Bernstein, replying to "Jacob Alperin-Sheriff 🐵 (@DemocraticLuntz)" (757908603546198016):
2945 followup papers so far. Many citations come after, and fail to mention, poly-time quantum key recovery.
2016.07.26 13:35:00 (757902033051611136) from Daniel J. Bernstein:
When users fall prey to this bait and switch, mixing up practical Ring-LWE with HUGE Ring-LWE, lattice salesmen deny responsibility.
2016.07.26 13:42:45 (757903981456744448) from Daniel J. Bernstein:
Lattice salesmen pretend that attacks are well understood, and respond to research with denial. Why am I reminded of quantum cryptographers?
2016.07.26 13:44:03 (757904309749161985) from "David Irvine (@metaquestions)":
Cheers Daniel, I appreciate your analysis and dedication, do you have a good link for the current lattice state? thanks again
2016.07.26 14:01:07 (757908603546198016) from "Jacob Alperin-Sheriff 🐵 (@DemocraticLuntz)", replying to "David Irvine (@metaquestions)" (757904309749161985):
Who still points to Gentry's actual scheme?