2017.03.23 19:41:32 (844982461297803264) from Daniel J. Bernstein, replying to "Rich Felker (@RichFelker)" (844981792931282944):
You're making a fool of yourself. Some of the claims from @hdevalence don't even survive a check against the email he dumped.
2017.03.23 16:49:01 (844939046552002560) from Daniel J. Bernstein:
Did you hear the alternative facts from @hdevalence last week? Let's now take a look at the _actual_ facts: https://eindhoven.cr.yp.to/false-statements-by-henry-de-valence.txt
2017.03.23 17:34:18 (844950443105161221) from "Rich Felker (@RichFelker)":
"Alt facts" = things that are objectively, verifiably false. Not a victim's acct of their experience you distrust.
2017.03.23 19:38:07 (844981602505625600) from Daniel J. Bernstein, replying to "Rich Felker (@RichFelker)" (844950443105161221):
Did you read? @hdevalence has stated many things (and implied/insinuated many more) that are objectively, verifiably false.
2017.03.23 19:38:53 (844981792931282944) from "Rich Felker (@RichFelker)":
I think you're working with "alternative" definitions of "objective" and "verifiable".