The cr.yp.to microblog: 2017.03.26 17:27:17

2017.03.26 17:27:17 (846020742466678784) from Daniel J. Bernstein, replying to "Democratic Gremlin iz @Teelin@det.social 🌻 (@Teelin)" (845992022712430595):

The @TUeindhoven rules generally _allow_ complaints straight to the central committees. But step-by-step is encouraged. @stonehead

Context

2017.03.25 19:22:01 (845702325809414144) from "St⭕nehead (@stonehead)":

The @ioerror saga continued: djb's accusatory comments on the previous chapter. Intimacy vs formal rules, it's hard. https://eindhoven.cr.yp.to/false-statements-by-henry-de-valence.txt

2017.03.26 07:20:55 (845868144623169536) from "Democratic Gremlin iz @Teelin@det.social 🌻 (@Teelin)", replying to "St⭕nehead (@stonehead)" (845702325809414144):

Procedure re harassment at @TUeindhoven DOESN'T require reporting to professor as claimed by @hashbreaker https://static.tue.nl/fileadmin/content/universiteit/Over_de_universiteit/integriteit/Complaints_procedure_psychosocial_workload_TUE_01.pdf

2017.03.26 13:10:52 (845956210012704768) from Daniel J. Bernstein, replying to "Democratic Gremlin iz @Teelin@det.social 🌻 (@Teelin)" (845868144623169536):

You're fabricating claims that I never actually made. @stonehead @TUeindhoven

2017.03.26 15:33:10 (845992022712430595) from "Democratic Gremlin iz @Teelin@det.social 🌻 (@Teelin)":

Simply saying @TUeindhoven complaint process doesn't require reporting directly with supervisor nor more - no less @stonehead